Talk:Sukhoi Su-35/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Roh^G??· 14:28, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator: Sp33dyphil

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Fine.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead is good..
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	yes.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Well sourced.No plagiarism.
	2c. it contains no original research.	no prob.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	yes.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	yeah.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Not particularly controversial.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Yes.
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	yes.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Alright.
	7. Overall assessment.	Whoa! Passed.

Errors/comments

More than a dozen of these were built with(What??) some used by the Russian Knights aerobatic demonstration team Roh^G??· 15:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A word was missing there. That's been fixed. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done

I would like to see a good pic under upgraded su-27..If you can do so.. no probs.

I'm afraid there are no pictures of the first Su-35s. The photos that you see are all Su-35BMs. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 06:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Su-35UB and Russian Knights Su-35 images are both pre-Su-35BM/S. Note the canards near the engine inlets. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:26, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello mate!what i supposed to say is ,if you have any other images for upgraded su-27 please upload it. so that the picture will meet wiki standards.

Note: The image updated is up to wiki standards but if you have a good one replace it with the old one.

Done Fine!

Article already has Operational History.. No need of Operators?

It is a standard section per WP:Aircraft layout and is very short. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done Alright

All issues are fixed!Promoted to GA.Hope this article make a FA status.Thanks to the Nominator for a wonderful article.